Archive for May, 2006

The Da Vinci Code

Monday, May 22nd, 2006

So I went and saw it. I funded blasphemy. Well… oh well. So did anyone who bought the book.

Anyways. You can read a lot of what I said Here. None of it is any special and probably has already been said many other places already.

One thing that struck me though at the end of the movie was when he kneeled before her tomb and prayed. It seemed to me that what the movie conveyed, and this is probably just my VERY wishful thinking, was a deep sense of longing. A longing to be in communion with God. A longing to have something tangible that will connect us to Jesus. See, there is obviously no grave we can go and worship at, since Jesus isn’t dead. So what’s the next best perverted fulfillment of this longing? Why not a dead wife! Yeah, that’s it… If Jesus had a wife who he ‘communed’ with, well that’s just as good! Because when a man and woman are joined, the two become one (therefore making Mary God) so if she has a grave, well, we can go there and worship!!! Yay! We now have a sacred thing to worship and a descendant of God to be here with us on earth.

Ok, so that’s stupid, but it’s quasi-understandable why it would be desired. The human condition is separation from God, so wouldn’t it be awesome if God had descendants here? Why, we would then be reunited with God! Yeah, the movie is a perverted twisted idea of a way to bridge the gap between man and God. But I somewhat understand (or can, for my comfort, make up) a way in which it comes from an honest spiritual need and longing.

It’s just sad that people are going to walk out of theaters all over the country believing the BS that was feed to them.

If you really want to kneel at the bones of some saint or martyr who walked with Jesus or on of his followers, simply visit your local Orthodox church. EVERY Orthodox church has a relic (usually a small fragment of bone from a follower of Christ, or a saint, or martyr). Yeah, it’s kind of cool to know that there is a relic of some hero who died for Christ right there in your church…

So anyways… Yeah… Interesting/suspensefull/action packed/intriguing movie, whose content was utter bs and garbage. Sad really. Heresy passes for entertainment, and Christians will actually indulge in it… Sigh…

White Guilt

Monday, May 22nd, 2006

Reading “White Guilt – How BLACKS & WHITES Together DESTROYED the PROMISE of the CIVIL RIGHTS ERA” by Shelby Steele. Extremely well written and eye opening. Only 1/3 of the way into it, but may post more on it when finished…

“no group in human history has been lifted into excellence or competitiveness by another group. No group has even benefited from the assistance of others without already having taken complete responsibility itself – complete to the point of saying that we appreciate your desire to help, but the help itself is unwelcome for the weakness it breeds. This is precisely the leap of fath that transorms people from slaves into their own masters.”

To be clear, if you did not gather this from the quote above, this book is not saying “white people are guilty of racism, and responsible for the oppression and poor state of the black people in America today!”. It is rather saying that since Black people are not taking full responsibility for their shortcomings, and since white people (because of fear for being called racist, and a genuine urge to help black people succeed) are lowering the standards, and giving preferential treatment to blacks, it is in effect the same thing as segregation and racism. This lack of responsibility on the part of blacks, and this ‘helpfulness’ on the part of whites, operates upon the assumption that “whites are better, and that in order to succeed blacks need their help”. This is utterly FALSE. If blacks are truly equal (the ARE) then they should not receive special treatment and passes from whites. They should be treated equal in every way.

I probably did a horrible job of explaining that, but nevertheless, just read the book.

Oh, and before you start complaining about it as unfair to say, or racist, or whatever, Shelby Steele is a black guy who grew up in the 50’s and was a black militant for some time (before growing up and realizing how racist this was). So, he presumably would know what he is talking about…

He’s got two other books I plan on reading once finished with this one. Check him out.

lol…

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

There it is. He actually put it on his page:

“Julie, you’re a great cook! This chilli is supreme. Mmm, yeah.”

I wrote requesting he compliment julie’s cooking, and he did, lol…

How silly…

My house…

Monday, May 15th, 2006

Ok, so it’s not mine yet, but I’m going to look at it today, and I think I’m going to make an offer…

(It’s the first one, not the second one)

Buenos Dias!!!!

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

One of those ‘e-mail forwards’…

“On May 1st, as a result of the Mexican boycott, national retailers reported 4.2% lower sales for the day, with a 67.8% reduction in shoplifting.”

…Probably just a Leno joke, but who knows. I tried looking it up on snopes, but it wasn’t there so, maybe it’s true. I half believe it…

Did a google on it and came up with these:

http://fishback.blogspot.com/2006/05/on-may-first.html#comments
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1627659/replies?c=15
http://dallas.craigslist.org/pol/157683396.html

So nothing official really… Looks like people just got it from a forward like me. Still funny though…

Governments Lie… Or do they?

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

Something has always bothered me about the “governments lie” quote…

That quote implies that:

1. All governments are the same (they are not)

2. All governments are bad (you must be an anarchist to think this)

3. All governments are separate entities from their citizens (not democracies)

4. All governments are to not be trusted (only if they are made of un-trustworthy people)

However, I actually do believe and agree with the quote, but only because: “people lie”. That’s just it.

It’s not that governments are lying, it’s that people are lying.

Now, if we take for example, China (as I know more about the Chinese government than any other save the US) I agree with the quote. That government lies. That government is a separate entity from it’s people.

But if you look at the government on which this nation was built, and on which the conservative movement attempts to maintain, you just can’t say that government lies (well, you can say whatever you want, but you are wrong). Because that government is incapable of actually DOING ANYTHING. It is made by the people for the people. Why would the people just lie to themselves? Especially with different people in office every other year? That would mean there was some sort of massive conspiracy who was conspiring to lie to itself.

Do I think that liberals lie, and lie often? Yes. Most definitely. They don’t hold to our traditional American values, nor do they attempt to keep with the original spirit and intent of our government.

So, when the liberals control our government, I guess you could say our government lies, but that is because it is comprised of liars. When conservatives control our government, I think it lies less. This doesn’t mean that I think that conservatives are incapable of lying, it just means that I think they are less inclined to lie (or even refuse to do so to their detriment). What is there to be gained from lying?

Did Bush lie about WMDs so that we would go to Iraq? No. Why would he? More importantly HOW would he? How in the world would he have faked ALL of that pre-war intelligence? EVERYONE thought they had WMDs. Not because Bush told them. They thought that because that is what their intelligence was saying. Bush only thought that because that was what OUR intelligence was saying. If he had cooked the whole thing up, don’t you think that would have leaked by now? Don’t you think some low level CIA agent would be saying, “Yeah, they gave me a pre-written report on WMDs and made me sign my name on it, and turn it in as if I had written it”. I honestly believe that Bush (just like everyone else) honestly believed there were WMDs there, and I think that there WERE WMDs there, and I think they were smuggled into Iran or buried or something. Also, they have FOUND WMDs there, the media just hasn’t reported it.

So do some (maybe most) governments lie? Yes. Especially when they are not comprised of normal citizens. Does the US government lie? Umm… There IS no such thing. There are a bunch of people we have elected to make official policy and decisions for us, and sometimes those people lie because they are evil or have something to gain/hide. So depending on what year it is, it’s possible that the US government is full of liars. But if they are really liars, elect someone else.

Also, if you are the sort of person who does drugs, or has tried drugs, you will be more inclined to say that “everybody does it”. If you are the sort of person who has indiscriminate sex, you will probably say “everybody does it”. Just as if you are the sort of person who cheats, you will almost surely say “everybody does it” and be paranoid of others doing it, and accuse them of doing it. Just as if you are a liar you will think everyone else lies and accuse others of lying often. Which is why I am even more convinced that liberals and the media are a bunch of liars. They think everyone does it.

I don’t. I think that there are people out there that won’t. I know people who won’t. I think that the conservative party is made up of people who won’t. They are made up of people who when it comes down to brass tax, will tell the truth every time, even if it means ruining their career.

propaganda

Tuesday, May 9th, 2006

Take a look at this.

I probably haven’t said it here, but I honestly believe that the media, ie. most journalists, are trained to hate conservatives, especially christians, and especially those in power in the government (and in big business for that matter). Sorry Jason, I think it’s true.

Several things illustrate this point.

1a. President Who’s visit to the US, and the Phong Gong (butchered that one) protestor.

The protester was ridiculed and frowned upon by the media. They agonized about the “face” that president who lost because of this, and were astonished that Bush would actually let this happen! How could he?!?

1b. The protestor who protested Rummy (that Rumsfeld) recently. They had a feild day finding out who this person was, why they did it, etc. Shame on Rumsfeld! Look at this person and the pain he has caused her!

WHAT ABOUT THE PERSON WHO PROTESTED WHO??? Who were they? What did they say? WHY did they say it? I had to talk to my Chinese co-worker to find out! Why didn’t the media lovingly fawn over that protestor like they do with all the others? (Cindy Shehan, the “band of brothers”, the retired generals). Sorry, if you are a conservative, and you protest, the you might as well be a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear it.

2. Pictures.

Pictures are the best tool in propaganda. They instantly tell 1000 words, and they are the universal language. Picture rock, and the media uses them to stone people all the time.

Lets take just the current Iran situation. Look at all of the pictures from JUST TODAY in yahoo. You will see that over 70% of the ones of the Iranian president are of a benevolent leader. He just wants peace. Just a little cheap power. It’s his right! Such a victim of US tyranny and oppression!!!! Then over 60% of the ones of the bush administration are over grumpy old elitist scoundrels, and frowning evil witches (condi). So opressive, so evil. It’s no wonder people sympathize with the enemy. The media WANTS them to. Otherwise, they would get the pictures of the enemy when THEY are frowning or making a funny face or something, and only use the ones where condi is laughing and smiling (there are a few) and where bush looks like a loveable old grandpa.

But instead you get this:

This is a perfect illustration of my point. Here you have ONE picture. The editors of this paper put these two pictures together. The lovable dictator smiling and beseeching the evil grumpy elitist bush to just let him and his poor starving nation have some cheap NUCLEAR power…

To see all of the images I selected from TODAYS NEWS from Yahoo.com to illustrate my point, go here:

http://www.cmcculloh.com/images.html

It’s the worst game ever.

Tuesday, May 9th, 2006

hehe.

So I get up to go to work this morning, but I’m just not quite yet ready to really get up. There are some days when I really just have trouble waking up. I know a cup of coffee would probably fix that, but I’m just too lazy to get that coffee maker ready the night before and put it on a timer. Plus, I like to have my daily cup about 2 hours after I get to work. It’s just a nice little jolt to really get me going when I start feeling tired again.

So I decide that instead of trying to shave (first thing I do when I wake up… well, it’s the second thing I do, but the first after the first thing everyone does…) I decided to check my e-mail. What harm could come of that right? Wrong.

Turns out that some kid decides that he is finally going to turn in his final homework assignment. I sent this e-mail out about 3 weeks ago (I’ll just put the relevant parts):

I’ll take off five points if you get it to me
after monday (5/1/06). You will get a 0 if you don’t get it to me by 5/8/06.

1 point For turning it in by 4/28/06 (-5 points if turned in after 5/8/06)

So yeah, I give conflicting information. First I say that you will get a zero if you turn it in after 5/8/06, then I say that you will just get 5 points taken off. Which is it (it was supposed to be you would get a zero after the eighth)? Well, a smart person would go with the strictest of the two. Especially since I initially say that you will get the five points off if you turn it in after the first, and then mention nothing about the first in the actual requirements. However, a procrastonator would be like, “hah! He screwed up! So I have until the 8th to turn it in, but really, I can wait as long as I want!”.

So what did this guy do? Turned it in at 1:45 am on the 9th. So either way he gets points off.

The game? It’s the worst game ever.

What do I do? I follow his lead and do something stupid. After grading his game, I write this e-mail:

It’s the worst game ever. He only gets a 69%. That makes this even
harder, because if he had done an AWESOME job and that’s why it took
so long, it would have been easy to go through all the loops to get
his grade changed or whatever is going to have to happen now. Below is
the original e-mail, please let me know what I need to do. Should I
just enter a 0 in the grade book? Thanks, -Chris

…and I accidently send that e-mail to HIM instead of the teacher I am a grader for.

OOOOPS.

I just told that student that they turned in the worst game ever. At least it was true. Also it gave me the biggest laugh I’ve gotten in a long time. Maybe because I was reaaaally sleepy when I did it, or maybe just because it’s funny, or maybe because I tend to laugh when horrible things happen, but this time I just couldn’t stop. Hope you find it chuckle worthy…

WMDs? What WMDs? I thought Iraq didn’t have WMDs?

Monday, May 8th, 2006

Yeah… So what about this?

//////begin quotes from/or entire articles////////

Headline: Iraq Survey Chief Duelfer: Saddam Was Developing Nukes
Source: NewsMax
Byline: Carl Limbacher and Staff
Dateline: Thursday, August 5, 2004

Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear weapons development program at the time of the U.S. invasion in March 2003.

In comments that received virtually no press coverage in the United States, Duelfer testified that Iraq was “preserving and expanding its knowledge to design and develop nuclear weapons.” One Iraqi laboratory “was intentionally focused on research applicable for nuclear weapons development,” the top weapons inspector said.

Saddam was financing his nuclear program by misappropriating funds from the U.N.’s Oil-for-Food Program. Saddam was able to use Oil-for-Food to boost his military procurement budget to $500 million annually &$0150; a 100-fold increase from 1996 to 2003.

Saddam had stockpiled over 500 tons of yellow cake uranium ore since before the first Gulf War.

Iraq was also in talks with North Korea on the possibility of importing a 1,300 km missile system. Foreign missile experts were working in Iraq in defiance of U.N. sanctions, and had helped Iraq redesign the al-Samoud missile.

In June of this year, the U.S. Energy Department removed 1.8 tons of low-enriched uranium from al Tuwaitha. The low-enriched uranium stockpile could have produced enough highly enriched uranium to make a single nuclear bomb.

-and-

“Throughout May, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has expressed mounting concern at the outbreak of looting that has been taking place at Iraq’s abandoned nuclear sites – which number around 1,000 in total. JID has commissioned a leading British nuclear analyst to assess the security risk posed by the missing material and the golden opportunities the chaos in Iraq may have presented to international terrorists…

“The Baghdad Nuclear Research Facility, another important nuclear site that has been looted, houses the remains of the Osirak reactor bombed by Israel in 1981 and the USA during the 1991 Gulf War. It contains spent reactor fuel, as well as radioactive isotopes including caesium and cobalt – materials that could be used by terrorists for making radiological dispersal devices (commonly known as ‘dirty bombs’). Terrorists could obtain the material either directly or from looters selling material on the black market.”

-and-

“Sources told the paper that in the past few weeks weapons experts discovered that the Abu Ghraib military base near Baghdad was developing a weapon with a range of about 960 kilometres. Under limits set by the UN Security Council, Iraq was allowed missiles with a range of up to 150 kilometres only, The Times said. Blair, under growing pressure over allegations his office exaggerated intelligence reports to make Saddam Hussein’s regime appear more menacing, has hinted that further evidence of Baghdad’s secret programme has begun to emerge but has yet to be made public.

-and (this is the last one, and it is really long, I didn’t bother trying to edit it down to the bare facts as it is already somewhat of a compilation)-

Headline: Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
Source: CNSNews.com
Byline: Scott Wheeler
Dateline: October 04, 2004

Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein’s regime to work with some of the world’s most notorious terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans. They demonstrate that Saddam’s government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.

One of the Iraqi memos contains an order from Saddam for his intelligence service to support terrorist attacks against Americans in Somalia. The memo was written nine months before U.S. Army Rangers were ambushed in Mogadishu by forces loyal to a warlord with alleged ties to al Qaeda.

Other memos provide a list of terrorist groups with whom Iraq had relationships and considered available for terror operations against the United States.

Among the organizations mentioned are those affiliated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri, two of the world’s most wanted terrorists. Zarqawi is believed responsible for the kidnapping and beheading of several American civilians in Iraq and claimed responsibility for a series of deadly bombings in Iraq Sept. 30. Al-Zawahiri is the top lieutenant of al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, allegedly helped plan the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the U.S., and is believed to be the voice on an audio tape broadcast by Al-Jazeera television Oct. 1, calling for attacks on U.S. and British interests everywhere.

The source of the documents

A senior government official who is not a political appointee provided CNSNews.com with copies of the 42 pages of Iraqi Intelligence Service documents. The originals, some of which were hand-written and others typed, are in Arabic. CNSNews.com had the papers translated into English by two individuals separately and independent of each other.

There are no hand-writing samples to which the documents can be compared for forensic analysis and authentication. However, three other experts – a former weapons inspector with the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), a retired CIA counter-terrorism official with vast experience dealing with Iraq, and a former advisor to then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton on Iraq – were asked to analyze the documents. All said they comport with the format, style and content of other Iraqi documents from that era known to be genuine.

Laurie Mylroie, who authored the book, “Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein’s Unfinished War against America,” and advised Clinton on Iraq during the 1992 presidential campaign, told CNSNews.com that the papers represent “the most complete set of documents relating Iraq to terrorism, including Islamic terrorism” against the U.S.

Mylroie has long maintained that Iraq was a state sponsor of terrorism against the United States. The documents obtained by CNSNews.com , she said, include “correspondence back and forth between Saddam’s office and Iraqi Mukhabarat (intelligence agency). They make sense. This is what one would think Saddam was doing at the time.”

Bruce Tefft, a retired CIA official who specialized in counter-terrorism and had extensive experience dealing with Iraq, said that “based on available, unclassified and open source information, the details in these documents are accurate …”

The former UNSCOM inspector zeroed in on the signatures on the documents and “the names of some of the people who sign off on these things.

“This is fairly typical of that time era. [The Iraqis] were meticulous record keepers,” added the former U.N. official, who spoke with CNSNews.com on the condition of anonymity.

The senior government official, who furnished the documents to CNSNews.com, said the papers answer “whether or not Iraq was a state sponsor of Islamic terrorism against the United States. It also answers whether or not Iraq had an ongoing biological warfare project continuing through the period when the UNSCOM inspections ended.”

Presidential campaign focused on Iraq

The presidential campaign is currently dominated by debate over whether Saddam procured weapons of mass destruction and/or whether his government sponsored terrorism aimed at Americans before the U.S. invaded Iraq last year. Democratic nominee Sen. John Kerry has repeatedly rejected that possibility and criticized President Bush for needlessly invading Iraq.

“[Bush's] two main rationales – weapons of mass destruction and the al Qaeda/September 11 (2001) connection – have been proved false … by the president’s own weapons inspectors … and by the 9/11 Commission,” Kerry told an audience at New York University on Sept. 20.

The Senate Intelligence Committee’s probe of the 9/11 intelligence failures also could not produce any definitive links between Saddam’s government and 9/11. And United Nations as well as U.S. weapons inspectors in Iraq have been unable to find the biological and chemical weapons Saddam was suspected of possessing.

But the documents obtained by CNSNews.com shed new light on the controversy.

They detail the Iraqi regime’s purchase of five kilograms of mustard gas on Aug. 21, 2000 and three vials of malignant pustule, another term for anthrax, on Sept. 6, 2000. The purchase order for the mustard gas includes gas masks, filters and rubber gloves. The order for the anthrax includes sterilization and decontamination equipment. (See Saddam’s Possession of Mustard Gas)

The documents show that Iraqi intelligence received the mustard gas and anthrax from “Saddam’s company,” which Tefft said was probably a reference to Saddam General Establishment, “a complex of factories involved with, amongst other things, precision optics, missile, and artillery fabrication.”

“Sa’ad’s general company” is listed on the Iraqi documents as the supplier of the sterilization and decontamination equipment that accompanied the anthrax vials. Tefft believes this is a reference to the Salah Al-Din State Establishment, also involved in missile construction. (See Saddam’s Possession of Anthrax)

The Jaber Ibn Hayan General Company is listed as the supplier of the safety equipment that accompanied the mustard gas order. Tefft described the company as “a ‘turn-key’ project built by Romania, designed to produce protective CW (conventional warfare) and BW (biological warfare) equipment (gas masks and protective clothing).”

“Iraq had an ongoing biological warfare project continuing through the period when the UNSCOM inspections ended,” the senior government official and source of the documents said. “This should cause us to redouble our efforts to find the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction programs.”

‘Hunt the Americans’

The first of the 42 pages of Iraqi documents is dated Jan. 18, 1993, approximately two years after American troops defeated Saddam’s army in the first Persian Gulf War. The memo includes Saddam’s directive that “the party should move to hunt the Americans who are on Arabian land, especially in Somalia, by using Arabian elements …”

On Oct. 3, 1993, less than nine months after that Iraqi memo was written, American soldiers were ambushed in Mogadishu, Somalia by forces loyal to Somali warlord Mohammed Farah Aidid, an alleged associate of Osama bin Laden. Eighteen Americans were killed and 84 wounded during a 17-hour firefight that followed the ambush in which Aidid’s followers used civilians as decoys. (See Saddam’s Connections to al Qaeda)

An 11-page Iraqi memo, dated Jan. 25, 1993, lists Palestinian, Sudanese and Asian terrorist organizations and the relationships Iraq had with each of them. Of particular importance, Tefft said, are the relationships Iraq had already developed or was in the process of developing with groups and individuals affiliated with al Qaeda, such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri. The U.S. currently is offering rewards of up to $25 million for each man’s capture.

The documents describe Al-Jehad wa’l Tajdeed as “a secret Palestinian organization” founded after the first Persian Gulf War that “believes in armed struggle against U.S. and western interests.” The leaders of the group, according to the Iraqi memo, were stationed in Jordan in 1993, and when one of those leaders visited Iraq in November 1992, he “showed the readiness of his organization to execute operations against U.S. interests at any time.” (See More Saddam Connections to al Qaeda)

Tefft believes the Tajdeed group likely included al-Zarqawi, whom Teft described as “our current terrorist nemesis” in Iraq, “a Palestinian on a Jordanian passport who was with al Qaeda and bin Laden in Afghanistan prior to this period (1993).”

Tajdeed, which means Islamic Renewal, currently “has a website that posts Zarqawi’s speeches, messages, claims of assassinations and beheading videos,” Tefft told CNSNews.com. “The apparent linkages are too close to be accidental” and might “be one of the first operational contacts between an al Qaeda group and Iraq,” he added.

Tefft said the documents, all of which the Iraqi Intelligence Service labeled “Top secret, personal and urgent” show several links between Saddam’s government and terror groups dedicated not only to targeting America but also U.S. allies like Egypt and Israel.

The same 11-page memo refers to the “re-opening of the relationship” with Al-Jehad al-Islamy, which is described as “the most violent in Egypt,” responsible for the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. The documents go on to describe a Dec. 14, 1990 meeting between Iraqi intelligence officials and a representative of Al-Jehad al-Islamy, that ended in an agreement “to move against [the] Egyptian regime by doing martyr operations on conditions that we should secure the finance, training and equipments.” (See More Saddam Connections to al Qaeda)

Al-Zawahiri was one of the leaders of Jehad al-Islamy, which is also known as the Egyptian Islamic Group, and participated in the assassination of Sadat, Tefft said. “Iraq’s contact with the Egyptian Islamic Group is another operational contact between Iraq and al Qaeda,” he added.

One of the Asian groups listed on the Iraqi intelligence memo is J.U.I., also known as the Islamic Clerks Society. The group is currently led by Mawlana Fadhel al-Rahman, whom Tefft said is “an al Qaeda member and co-signed Osama bin Laden’s 1998 fatwa (religious ruling) to kill Americans.” The Iraqi memo from 1993 states that J.U.I.’s secretary general “has a good relationship with our system since 1981 and he is ready for any mission.” Tefft said the memo shows “another direct Iraq link to an al Qaeda group.”

Iraq had also maintained a relationship with the Afghani Islamist party since 1989, according to the memo. The “relationship was improved and became directly between the leader, Hekmatyar and Iraq,” it states, referring to Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, an Afghani warlord who fought against the Soviet Union and current al Qaeda ally, according to Tefft.

Last year, American authorities in Afghanistan ranked Hekmatyar third on their most wanted list, behind only bin Laden and former Taliban leader Mullah Omar. Hekmatyar represents “another Iraqi link to an al Qaeda group,” Tefft said. (See More Saddam Connections to al Qaeda)

The Iraqi intelligence documents also refer to terrorist groups previously believed to have had links with Saddam Hussein. They include the Palestine Liberation Front, a group dedicated to attacking Israel, and according to the Iraqi memo, one with “an office in Baghdad.”

The Abu Nidal group, suspected by the CIA of having acted as surrogates for Iraqi terrorist attacks, is also mentioned.

“The movement believes in political violence and assassinations,” the 1993 Iraqi memo states in reference to the Abu Nidal organization. “We have relationships with them since 1973. Currently, they have a representative in the country. Monthly helps are given to them — 20 thousand dinars – in addition to other supports,” the memo explains. (See Saddam’s Connections to Palestinian Terror Groups)

Iraq not only built and maintained relationships with terrorist groups, the documents show it appears to have trained terrorists as well. Ninety-two individuals from various Middle Eastern countries are listed on the papers.

Many are described as having “finished the course at M14,” a reference to an Iraqi intelligence agency, and to having “participated in Umm El-Ma’arek,” the Iraqi response to the U.S. invasion in 1991. The author of the list notes that approximately half of the individuals “all got trained inside the ‘martyr act camp’ that belonged to our directorate.”

The former UNSCOM weapons inspector who was asked to analyze the documents believes it’s clear that the Iraqis “were training people there in assassination and suicide bombing techniques … including non-Iraqis.”

Bush administration likely unaware of documents’ existence

The senior government official and source of the Iraqi intelligence memos, explained that the reason the documents have not been made public before now is that the government has “thousands and thousands of documents waiting to be translated.

“It is unlikely they even know this exists,” the source added.

The government official also explained that the motivation for leaking the documents, “is strictly national security and helping with the war on terrorism by focusing this country’s attention on facts and away from political posturing.

“This is too important to let it get caught up in the political process,” the source told CNSNews.com.

To protect against the Iraqi intelligence documents being altered or misrepresented elsewhere on the Internet, CNSNews.com has decided to publish only the first of the 42 pages in Arabic, along with the English translation. Portions of some of the other memos in translated form are also being published to accompany this report. Credentialed journalists and counter-terrorism experts seeking to view the 42 pages of Arabic documents or to challenge their authenticity may make arrangements to do so at CNSNews.com headquarters in Alexandria, Va.

////////////End Quotes/Articles/////////////////

There is so much more beyond that too, these are just a very few. EVERYBODY was saying Sadam had them. In fact, most of the people who are now saying he DIDN’T have them, are people with a vested interest in him NOT having had them. Like, liberals. Or, France and Germany who both got kick-backs from Sadam during the scandalous oil-for-food ‘program’ to the tune of millions of dollars. Oh, also, Sadam WAS tied to Al-quida. You can find LOT’S of info on that too. Oh, and terrorists being held in our prisons are NOT subject to geneva conventions, and should NOT be tried in our courts. I would probably interogate and execute them, but I’ll leave that up to the military to decide. These are not normal people. These are people hell bent on destroying the US. It doesn’t matter if they were beaten as children, or whether or not their daddy loved them. If we try to ’save’ them or ‘fix’ them, it will be to our demise. There are just too many of them, and they only respond to power. They have seen we are weak and think we are a joke. If we try to save them, in the end there will be none of us left to try and do any saving. They are a cancer on the human race, and if we really want to ’save’ anyone, we will cut out the cancer before it infects the rest of the body. That’s saving. This sounds cruel and ‘un-christian’ but how is it helping anyone to let these thugs spread their evil hate throughout the world? It’s just letting the cancer spread further. There is nothing we can do for 98% of them, and God is not so weak that he can’t find a way to save the 2% that there is hope for. Kill them, fight the war on terror, or we will go down the crapper just like Europe.

I’m tired of this bs about no WMDs and “Bush’s” war on Iraq being unjust, and those poor jihadists being tortured, and that poor moose-owie (I know, that’s not how you spell it) and his poor unfortunate childhood… It’s a WAR people. A WAR. Ever since Korea we have forgotten how to fight one. PEOPLE DIE. It’s the only way. Someone who hates you and has a completely different belief system than you, and has NO INTENTION to stopping until you are dead CANNOT be reasoned with. They might make you THINK they are being reasoned with, but it’s only just to buy THEM more time to kill YOU. You don’t try and negotiate with a rabid dog. You just shoot it.

(ohmygosh! He just called them rabid dogs! Oh no! …yeah, well. When you chop the heads off of fellow human beings -ESPECIALLY NON-COMBATANT CIVILIANS!!!!!!!!- as a negotiation tactic, you have placed yourself on that level. They need to be killed before they infect the rest of the world. But I actually think it is almost too late, if not already too late. Time to invade Iran.)

Mom, Dad, we set a date!

Thursday, May 4th, 2006

No, I’m not engaged again. Yes, Julie and I are fine. But Sue (my boss) and I have set a date. I’m to be finished with my Java (including JSP, and JSF) learning by the middle of June, and done with my first real project by the end of July.

If I read 50 pages of my books a day, and then work at a mediocre pace on the projects I’ll meet this deadline with weeks to spare…. (famous last words)

:D